Automated pipelines
Lint, typecheck, unit tests and optional detox/Appium hooks on pull requests and release branches.
Services
We help UK organisations modernise existing React Native apps: dependency upgrades, architecture review, native integration risk, performance work, and release planning — without assuming every app should rebuild or move to Expo.
The problem
Production React Native applications rarely fail overnight. Maintenance pain usually accumulates: React Native and React versions drift from community defaults, native toolchains move forward, dependencies pin incompatible versions, and custom native modules lag behind iOS and Android SDK requirements.
Teams then see longer build times, flaky CI, crashes that only reproduce on specific OS versions, and fear around every store release. Modernisation is about restoring predictable upgrade paths and measurable stability — not chasing every new framework flag on day one.
Upgrades
We inventory your dependency graph, native project settings, and breaking changes between your current and target React Native releases.
New Architecture
React Native’s New Architecture changes how JavaScript talks to native code. Enabling it can improve performance and unlock library improvements, but compatibility varies by dependency and custom native code.
We assess whether your app is a candidate for staged enablement, which modules block migration, and how to validate behaviour in internal builds before production rollout. We do not treat New Architecture adoption as mandatory for every product.
Expo
Expo provides strong tooling for builds (EAS), updates, and developer experience. Some brownfield apps can adopt Expo modules incrementally; others with heavy custom native code may remain on bare workflow or require a phased plan.
We compare bare React Native vs Expo against your native integrations, build pipeline, store requirements, and team skills — then document a migration path or a deliberate decision to stay bare.
Native code
Audit custom and third-party native modules for New Architecture support, maintenance status, and alternatives.
Resolve Gradle and Xcode failures, signing and provisioning drift, and 16 KB page size / SDK minimum changes as they apply.
Performance
We review whether Hermes is appropriate for your app, analyse startup and navigation performance, and use profiling tools to find JavaScript thread bottlenecks, over-rendering, and expensive lists.
Improvements are tied to user-visible outcomes — cold start, scroll smoothness, memory use — with before/after measurements where feasible.
Application structure
Delivery
Lint, typecheck, unit tests and optional detox/Appium hooks on pull requests and release branches.
EAS Build profiles, credentials management, and store submission workflows where Expo is in use.
Crash reporting (e.g. Sentry), release health, and structured logging for diagnosing field issues.
Strategy
Most apps should modernise in stages: stabilise releases, upgrade core versions, refactor the riskiest modules, then consider larger structural changes. A full rebuild is occasionally justified when product scope has changed dramatically or the codebase cannot support required security and compliance controls.
We document trade-offs honestly — including when a rebuild will take longer than stakeholders expect.
Technical audit
A typical audit produces written findings your team can execute internally or with our delivery support.
Knowledge transfer
Modernisation only sticks when your team can ship confidently afterwards. We pair on upgrades, document decisions, and leave runbooks for builds, releases, and common failure modes.
Timeline
A focused technical audit often fits in two to three weeks. Dependency upgrades and stabilisation commonly run from several weeks to a few months depending on native modules, release constraints and test coverage. We agree phases up front so you can pause between milestones.
How it works
We start with a discovery call, then define scope for an audit or delivery phase. You receive written findings, a prioritised plan and clear options — upgrade path, staged Expo adoption, or targeted rescue work — before larger build spend is committed.
FAQ
No. Expo is a strong option for many greenfield and some brownfield apps, but custom native modules, unusual build pipelines, or legacy native code may require a bare workflow or a hybrid phased approach. We assess fit before recommending migration.
Not always. Adoption depends on your React Native version, library compatibility, native module usage, and release risk tolerance. We inventory blockers and propose a staged enablement plan when appropriate.
Typically: codebase and dependency inventory, native integrations review, architecture and navigation/state assessment, build and CI/CD review, performance and stability signals, risk register, and a prioritised modernisation roadmap with upgrade-versus-rebuild options.
Yes. Algobots is based in Wirral and works with product and engineering teams UK-wide, combining on-site discovery when useful with remote delivery.
It depends on how far behind your app is, how many custom native modules you use, and how mature your CI and test coverage are. Small jumps with good automation can be weeks; multi-version catch-up with native rework can be months. We time-box discovery and give you a phased estimate before major delivery.
Yes. Many engagements pair our senior engineers with your team for pairing, code review and knowledge transfer. We can also lead a workstream while your team continues feature delivery on a separate branch strategy.
Book a free discovery call or send a short brief — we will respond with sensible next steps.